Wedding Rings
As I was mulling this over, I realized that married people – especially married women – are identified. In some cultures, it is through a different kind of hair covering. In others, it’s through a wedding ring. We learn to categorize wedding ring wearers as married and those without the band as unmarried. Once a person is categorized, all the stereotypes are flooding our system (they are primed by the environment – in this case, the presence or absence of a wedding ring). Wedding ring wearers are considered happier, healthier, and wealthier. People without the ring are lonely losers. Since couplemania and singlism are still largely unrecognized prejudices, we are unlikely to counter-act these beliefs to reduce the influence of the prejudices. This then perpetuates the myths that, well, married people are just somehow better (or at least better off) than singles. I never realized the importance of the obvious marker of marriage but clearly, it helps to maintain the status quo.
It seemed that while I was in High School that I rarely saw a woman wearing an engagement ring, either before or after marriage. I can even remember wondering why people would invest so much in something that seemed to be so rarely worn. But, about the time that yuppie-ism bloomed, it suddenly seemed as if big, fat, gaudy engagement rings were everywhere. Never having felt that such things were attractive, they’ve always seemed like an in over-the-top, in-your-face “I got it and you don’t”.
It kinda’ makes me wonder what’s next.