The Dreaded E-Word

Yupp, I mean exercise. To me, the most important question is: How much and how hard should I work out to live a good life? That wasn’t always the key question for me. A couple of years ago, I got wrapped up in the San Francisco overachiever exercise madness. “What are you training for?” seemed to be the key question then. And you better not answer that with anything less than a 10K! 5Ks are for losers – and not the weight-loss kind of losers… At least that’s the message. It never quite jived with the anecdote from my mom’s experience: She was on medication for arrhythmia. Then she started walking almost every day for about half an hour. She’s off the medication now. She’s not walking all that fast. But she is consistent. Then the first research clue came in. Jennifer Michael Hecht in her wonderful “Happiness Myth” made a side comment that there is little research that supports the idea that harder work-outs are better than simple walking (she calls gyms “halls of mirrors”). Getting off the couch is where the exercise benefits lie but beyond that, we don’t know – or, worse, we know that it’s not that good for you because the risk of injury is increasing dramatically. Again, that matches another anecdote. I just about burned myself out those couple years ago! I was training for who knows what by being in the gym almost every day for at least an hour. On the weekends longer. I didn’t get enough sleep and worked my body too hard. I couldn’t possibly be overtraining, I told myself when I started feeling tired all the time, because I wasn’t an athlete. It probably was a combination of a not quite under control hypothyroidism and, well, overtraining. At least, after a few months of doing this and breaking up with my gym-rat boy friend, I was able to accept that. And now I feel vindicated that my low-dose walking is all I really need. Research presented in Time magazine supports the idea that more, harder exercise isn’t better than regular every day walking (big hat tip to Bella DePaulo).

John Cloud, the article’s author, began to ask himself, too: “Why am I doing this?” His answer, in part: To lose weight.

One of the most widely accepted, commonly repeated assumptions in our culture is that if you exercise, you will lose weight. [...]

The conventional wisdom that exercise is essential for shedding pounds is actually fairly new. As recently as the 1960s, doctors routinely advised against rigorous exercise, particularly for older adults who could injure themselves. Today doctors encourage even their oldest patients to exercise, which is sound advice for many reasons: People who regularly exercise are at significantly lower risk for all manner of diseases — those of the heart in particular. They less often develop cancer, diabetes and many other illnesses. But the past few years of obesity research show that the role of exercise in weight loss has been wildly overstated. [...]

The basic problem is that while it’s true that exercise burns calories and that you must burn calories to lose weight, exercise has another effect: it can stimulate hunger. That causes us to eat more, which in turn can negate the weight-loss benefits we just accrued. Exercise, in other words, isn’t necessarily helping us lose weight. It may even be making it harder.

Of course, exercise isn’t a total waste of your time. There are many other benefits to it, as Cloud outlines, just weight loss isn’t one of them at least not automatically, especially with high-intensity work-outs in “halls of mirrors.”

In addition to enhancing heart health and helping prevent disease, exercise improves your mental health and cognitive ability. [...]

But there’s some confusion about whether it is exercise — sweaty, exhausting, hunger-producing bursts of activity done exclusively to benefit our health — that leads to all these benefits or something far simpler: regularly moving during our waking hours. We all need to move more [...]. But do we need to stress our bodies at the gym?

That is my question! Is it worth spending all that money – according to Cloud $19 billion per year – to go to the gym or can I just lace up my shoes and walk, like my mom?

Well, the research suggests that regular low-intensity exercise is just as beneficial as short bursts of intense exercise, like the gym-type stuff. As Cloud puts it

Many obesity researchers now believe that very frequent, low-level physical activity — the kind humans did for tens of thousands of years before the leaf blower was invented — may actually work better for us than the occasional bouts of exercise you get as a gym rat.

So, if you’re sweating in the gym to lose weight, you might want to reconsider. It’s better for your wallet (no gym membership) and the environment (no driving to the gym to work out on machines that require electricity) to simply go out and walk – and we now know that the research, too, shows that it’s better for our waistline.

I have finally implemented my plan to follow my mother’s routine and walk half an hour every morning even if that means I have to get up at the dreaded hour of 6 AM. I used a week off to get started with that routine. So far, it has at least one of the hoped for benefits: I sleep better!

Share this post with others:
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email
This entry was posted in Fitness. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Dreaded E-Word

  1. Singletude says:

    Thanks for this post! I feel kind of vindicated now. I love walking, but my ex-bf always scoffed at me because I didn’t sweat it out at the gym. Now I have proof that regular brisk walking is just as good! On that note, no wonder obese people seem so scarce in NYC. :)

  2. Cameron says:

    I’ve just discovered this blog, and while I love your championing the single lifestyle, I disagree with this post. I lost 25 pounds 7 years ago, and have kept the weight off, through changes in diet, combined with a devotion to running – modest distances on weekdays, then 11 miles every Saturday. And, while I don’t belong to a gym, work with weights intensively, leaving a 2-day period for muscle recovery.

    Mr. Stone in his article begins by describing exercise in the worst possible light: like a physically and psychologically tortuous ordeal. I say, while you want to ease into it, it’s a glorious release, a way of physically and mentally “recalibrating” yourself, and achieving numerous health benefits, to boot. And yes, walking is beneficial, but the way I’ve been a rare-success story in an area dominated by soul-crushing failure is through intensive exercise where you sustain major exertion for extended periods of time. And I don’t feel hungry after my 11-mile runs – I get into a “zone” where I don’t crave much food. Furthermore I don’t appreciate articles telling me – and thousands of others – we’ll eat more food and GAIN weight through exercise when WE’RE the ones who achieved success in a way that’s completely at odds with this article’s claims.

    I have NO problem saying Time’s article is misguided, and they did a disservice by publishing it. With our cherished right to a free press, you can find many, many other articles refuting it online.

  3. Cameron says:

    This doesn’t allow html. So PLEASE check out a picture of myself, and how I’ve clearly sabotaged efforts to lose all that flab through my wrongheaded devotion to heavy exercise :-P

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v688/seejay1/me.jpg

  4. Rachel says:

    Cameron: Anecdotal evidence – i.e., your experience – doesn’t disprove the research cited in the Time’s article. Neither can articles online refute it unless they’re based on sound research methodology.

    Please note that the Time’s article did not say that exercise is bad (oh, yes, this does allow HTML; comments just need to be approved manually by me). It simply presented research that calls into question the claim by the fitness industry that you have to work-out very, very hard to see any benefits (preferably also spend lots of money at a health club or on a personal trainer).

  5. Wiebes says:

    Very interesting post!! I for one hate exercising but do walk quite a bit (about 45 min per day, mostly to and from work but also to the mall or 7-11 for a slurpee). I play quite a bit of “recreational” sports like soccer and I go skiing and golfing. So I can see both sides of the argument, because I eat anything I want to and have a sky-high metabolism. I can’t gain weight if I try. I can eat junk for a month and I will not gain weight. I wonder if long-term exercise or a healthy lifestyle boosts the metabolism to the point where I can eat more than the average person. I personally think it is a combination of moderation between diet and exercise. I have to agree with Cameron – I am not hungry after playing competitive or recreational sports – I am usualy excited if we win, and exhausted, but not hungry.

Please leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>