<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr Tiller&#8217;s murder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/</link>
	<description>Sharing ideas and provocations on living single while happy. Reflecting on the social psychology of stereotypes and other cultural phenomena.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:46:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/comment-page-1/#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/?p=906#comment-3072</guid>
		<description>I am not quite sure how you&#039;d go about doing that: Teaching everybody to perform abortions.  That&#039;s like suggesting that everybody should learn how to repair their own teeth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not quite sure how you&#8217;d go about doing that: Teaching everybody to perform abortions.  That&#8217;s like suggesting that everybody should learn how to repair their own teeth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the lamp</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/comment-page-1/#comment-3069</link>
		<dc:creator>the lamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/?p=906#comment-3069</guid>
		<description>Democratize abortions.  Forget government aid.  Everyone should know how to kill a fetus, then it will be unstoppable.  I know this is unpleasant but relying upon bourgeois doctors means that there will be only a handful of rockstar doctors who anti-abortion fanatics can concentrate upon and eliminate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratize abortions.  Forget government aid.  Everyone should know how to kill a fetus, then it will be unstoppable.  I know this is unpleasant but relying upon bourgeois doctors means that there will be only a handful of rockstar doctors who anti-abortion fanatics can concentrate upon and eliminate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/comment-page-1/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/?p=906#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know... As I stare at the Gallup charts I am wondering if this is some sort of data error. The pro-choice numbers have been consistently been above 45% and the anti-choice below 45% and now in 2009, they switch dramatically? Seems odd to me.  If there had been a downward trend in the pro-life support during the Bush years, it would make more sense. But why this dramatic and unprecedented drop?  The top graph also doesn&#039;t seem to be consistent with the graphs below it. 

On the other hand, they mention other surveys: &quot;Americans&#039; recent shift toward the pro-life position is confirmed in two other surveys.&quot; And
&lt;blockquote&gt;
The source of the shift in abortion views is clear in the Gallup Values and Beliefs survey. The percentage of Republicans (including independents who lean Republican) calling themselves &quot;pro-life&quot; rose by 10 points over the past year, from 60% to 70%, while there has been essentially no change in the views of Democrats and Democratic leaners.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Why?!? That&#039;s a big shift all the sudden.  I guess that&#039;s your point: The anti-choice people are coming out of the wood-works but wouldn&#039;t that have shown up on previous surveys? I mean, assuming that Gallup does the surveying right, their samples are representative samples.  And people couldn&#039;t just hide... 

Here&#039;s what Gallup speculates: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
It is possible that, through his abortion policies, Obama has pushed the public&#039;s understanding of what it means to be &quot;pro-choice&quot; slightly to the left, politically. While Democrats may support that, as they generally support everything Obama is doing as president, it may be driving others in the opposite direction.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Still seems odd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230; As I stare at the Gallup charts I am wondering if this is some sort of data error. The pro-choice numbers have been consistently been above 45% and the anti-choice below 45% and now in 2009, they switch dramatically? Seems odd to me.  If there had been a downward trend in the pro-life support during the Bush years, it would make more sense. But why this dramatic and unprecedented drop?  The top graph also doesn&#8217;t seem to be consistent with the graphs below it. </p>
<p>On the other hand, they mention other surveys: &#8220;Americans&#8217; recent shift toward the pro-life position is confirmed in two other surveys.&#8221; And</p>
<blockquote><p>
The source of the shift in abortion views is clear in the Gallup Values and Beliefs survey. The percentage of Republicans (including independents who lean Republican) calling themselves &#8220;pro-life&#8221; rose by 10 points over the past year, from 60% to 70%, while there has been essentially no change in the views of Democrats and Democratic leaners.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Why?!? That&#8217;s a big shift all the sudden.  I guess that&#8217;s your point: The anti-choice people are coming out of the wood-works but wouldn&#8217;t that have shown up on previous surveys? I mean, assuming that Gallup does the surveying right, their samples are representative samples.  And people couldn&#8217;t just hide&#8230; </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what Gallup speculates: </p>
<blockquote><p>
It is possible that, through his abortion policies, Obama has pushed the public&#8217;s understanding of what it means to be &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; slightly to the left, politically. While Democrats may support that, as they generally support everything Obama is doing as president, it may be driving others in the opposite direction.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Still seems odd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/comment-page-1/#comment-3025</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/?p=906#comment-3025</guid>
		<description>Thanks Wiebes &amp; Elsie! This is interesting, though disconcerting, data...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Wiebes &#038; Elsie! This is interesting, though disconcerting, data&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiebes</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/comment-page-1/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiebes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/?p=906#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>Backup for previous post - very interesting indeed! 

http://www.gallup.com/poll/118399/more-americans-pro-life-than-pro-choice-first-time.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backup for previous post &#8211; very interesting indeed! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/118399/more-americans-pro-life-than-pro-choice-first-time.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.gallup.com/poll/118399/more-americans-pro-life-than-pro-choice-first-time.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singletude</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/dr-tillers-murder/comment-page-1/#comment-3020</link>
		<dc:creator>Singletude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/?p=906#comment-3020</guid>
		<description>To lend support for your theory, I read today that polls show that &lt;a&gt;more Americans are now pro-life than pro-choice&lt;/a&gt;.  Anytime you have a polarizing administration in place, the opposition will be motivated to circle the wagons and redouble their forces.  That&#039;s not meant to detract in any way from all the good that the Obama administration is doing, but it is an unfortunate fallout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To lend support for your theory, I read today that polls show that <a>more Americans are now pro-life than pro-choice</a>.  Anytime you have a polarizing administration in place, the opposition will be motivated to circle the wagons and redouble their forces.  That&#8217;s not meant to detract in any way from all the good that the Obama administration is doing, but it is an unfortunate fallout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

