<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criticism of Buddhism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/</link>
	<description>Sharing ideas and provocations on living single while happy. Reflecting on the social psychology of stereotypes and other cultural phenomena.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent mosher</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/comment-page-4/#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>brent mosher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>Paul, Srini,Riglin, Rachel and everybody

I&#039;ve been reading over the recent posts both on this page and the End of Buddhist Spirituality page. Lots to digest. Thanks, Srini, for the articles. That&#039;s a lot of reading and I&#039;ve only been able to quickly peruse a few of them. I see Rachel is busy with school, and I haven&#039;t had time either to get to the readings I was planning on doing, including Srini&#039;s list. Paul, I&#039;m sorry, but I&#039;m going to postpone a reply to your posts for a while longer. I feel like I&#039;ve plateaued, and while I have a few points to make, I think it would be more prudent to wait til I&#039;ve digested the readings more.

When is this fall break Srini spoke of? It would be helpful if I had a deadline. 

I will make one point about Trungpa and his followers. The people in Shambala in Halifax do not think they are in a personality cult. Quite the contrary: they are certain theirs is the most uncorrupted lineage of Tibetan Buddhism. So, the majority of them followed their guru and rationalized his behaviour. Once when I was discussing Buddhism with my therapist, who was a Buddhist and follower of Trungpa, I suggested to him that maybe his devotion to Trungpa was as deluded a belief as any Christian notion of eternal life. How does one know? How does any Buddhist know that their particular sect or school isn&#039;t off the rails? Buddha rejected all the schools, didn&#039;t he? I don&#039;t think, maybe, it&#039;s so much about wanting to reinvent the wheel, as realizing that the wheel seems to continually fall into corrupt hands. So, some of choose to just sit, and learn with an open mind, and look at institutionalized Buddhism with a wary and skeptical eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, Srini,Riglin, Rachel and everybody</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading over the recent posts both on this page and the End of Buddhist Spirituality page. Lots to digest. Thanks, Srini, for the articles. That&#8217;s a lot of reading and I&#8217;ve only been able to quickly peruse a few of them. I see Rachel is busy with school, and I haven&#8217;t had time either to get to the readings I was planning on doing, including Srini&#8217;s list. Paul, I&#8217;m sorry, but I&#8217;m going to postpone a reply to your posts for a while longer. I feel like I&#8217;ve plateaued, and while I have a few points to make, I think it would be more prudent to wait til I&#8217;ve digested the readings more.</p>
<p>When is this fall break Srini spoke of? It would be helpful if I had a deadline. </p>
<p>I will make one point about Trungpa and his followers. The people in Shambala in Halifax do not think they are in a personality cult. Quite the contrary: they are certain theirs is the most uncorrupted lineage of Tibetan Buddhism. So, the majority of them followed their guru and rationalized his behaviour. Once when I was discussing Buddhism with my therapist, who was a Buddhist and follower of Trungpa, I suggested to him that maybe his devotion to Trungpa was as deluded a belief as any Christian notion of eternal life. How does one know? How does any Buddhist know that their particular sect or school isn&#8217;t off the rails? Buddha rejected all the schools, didn&#8217;t he? I don&#8217;t think, maybe, it&#8217;s so much about wanting to reinvent the wheel, as realizing that the wheel seems to continually fall into corrupt hands. So, some of choose to just sit, and learn with an open mind, and look at institutionalized Buddhism with a wary and skeptical eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/comment-page-4/#comment-4385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/#comment-4385</guid>
		<description>I want to first apologise for jumping in on your forum without having even introduced myself. I am an Australian living in Japan and have been practicing Buddhism and studying it&#039;s history for a little over 20 years now. I began my practice of Buddhism in the Shingon school (vajrayana) and then took up Zen (Soto school). I began my practice in Australia under Japanese teachers - and it was with a &quot;Western&quot; point of view that my teachers passed on their knowledge.

I haven&#039;t had enough time to read all of the above posts thoroughly, so I must apologise if anything I say is already posted above. Also I have only a little time on my hands to bash out this post, so please forgive my brevity.

The first thing I want to state is that Buddhism in Japan is a sham. Buddhism in Japan is a funeral business run by families who have been handing down the funeral business since the early Edo period (1600-1868). Each Buddhist temple here belongs to the monk who resides in a house attached to the temple. There are no student monks or homeless people living in the temples as in other Asian countries. There are no monks in training and there are no meditation classes. In order to learn Buddhism here in Japan you must be born into a Buddhist temple family. 

People in Japan attend Buddhist temples for only two reasons - to pray to Buddha for something they may want (amulets and magical talismans blessed by the monks are sold for many prayers) and to attend funerals.

Monks are paid enormous amounts of money to recite the Buddhist funeral rites and to ensure that the souls of the dead pass over into heaven (monks have cars and big houses and huge families). ALL the various sects here believe that when a person dies, their soul goes to heaven or waits to be reborn. Dosen&#039;t sound like what is written in English books on Japanese Buddhism does it? You&#039;re right, what is written in English books is Westernised and modernised Buddhism. That is a secular Buddhism devoid of all the intense ritual and magical stuff that goes on here.

Buddhism here requires that one believe in souls and ghosts (that pay a visit on a specific time of the year) and that the Buddha watches over all that you do.

Just quickly, in regards to karma, the Japanese believe in the Hindu version of Karma (many Buddhists the world over do, as Brahmin teachings entered Buddhism during the great Mahayana schism). They believe that your suffering now is caused by something you have done wrong in a previous life and also that your relatives may affect your karma. A point in case, I look after disabled children: it is the belief of most Japanese (yes, Buddhist monks too) that these disabled people are paying for misdeeds in a previous life. 

These beliefs, this form of Buddhism, has been this way since Buddhism was introduced here in the 8th century - so the Japanese don&#039;t understand any other way. Buddhism is a big business that rakes in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. The biggest land owners are the monks who own the temples with enough land for the graves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to first apologise for jumping in on your forum without having even introduced myself. I am an Australian living in Japan and have been practicing Buddhism and studying it&#8217;s history for a little over 20 years now. I began my practice of Buddhism in the Shingon school (vajrayana) and then took up Zen (Soto school). I began my practice in Australia under Japanese teachers &#8211; and it was with a &#8220;Western&#8221; point of view that my teachers passed on their knowledge.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had enough time to read all of the above posts thoroughly, so I must apologise if anything I say is already posted above. Also I have only a little time on my hands to bash out this post, so please forgive my brevity.</p>
<p>The first thing I want to state is that Buddhism in Japan is a sham. Buddhism in Japan is a funeral business run by families who have been handing down the funeral business since the early Edo period (1600-1868). Each Buddhist temple here belongs to the monk who resides in a house attached to the temple. There are no student monks or homeless people living in the temples as in other Asian countries. There are no monks in training and there are no meditation classes. In order to learn Buddhism here in Japan you must be born into a Buddhist temple family. </p>
<p>People in Japan attend Buddhist temples for only two reasons &#8211; to pray to Buddha for something they may want (amulets and magical talismans blessed by the monks are sold for many prayers) and to attend funerals.</p>
<p>Monks are paid enormous amounts of money to recite the Buddhist funeral rites and to ensure that the souls of the dead pass over into heaven (monks have cars and big houses and huge families). ALL the various sects here believe that when a person dies, their soul goes to heaven or waits to be reborn. Dosen&#8217;t sound like what is written in English books on Japanese Buddhism does it? You&#8217;re right, what is written in English books is Westernised and modernised Buddhism. That is a secular Buddhism devoid of all the intense ritual and magical stuff that goes on here.</p>
<p>Buddhism here requires that one believe in souls and ghosts (that pay a visit on a specific time of the year) and that the Buddha watches over all that you do.</p>
<p>Just quickly, in regards to karma, the Japanese believe in the Hindu version of Karma (many Buddhists the world over do, as Brahmin teachings entered Buddhism during the great Mahayana schism). They believe that your suffering now is caused by something you have done wrong in a previous life and also that your relatives may affect your karma. A point in case, I look after disabled children: it is the belief of most Japanese (yes, Buddhist monks too) that these disabled people are paying for misdeeds in a previous life. </p>
<p>These beliefs, this form of Buddhism, has been this way since Buddhism was introduced here in the 8th century &#8211; so the Japanese don&#8217;t understand any other way. Buddhism is a big business that rakes in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. The biggest land owners are the monks who own the temples with enough land for the graves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent mosher</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/comment-page-4/#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>brent mosher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>Srini

Thank you for your comments and suggested articles. I will get around to reading them (the articles) sometime soon, I hope. I will respond when I have more time than I do now. 

Brent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Srini</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments and suggested articles. I will get around to reading them (the articles) sometime soon, I hope. I will respond when I have more time than I do now. </p>
<p>Brent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srini</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/comment-page-3/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>Brent,

And this fellow called Chogyam Trungpa broke the basic Five Precepts and people still believed in him. So whose fault is it? Is it the believers&#039; or Trungpa&#039;s.  
If a President of USA keeps controlling the Press but still says he is abiding by the Constitution, then the citizens need to bring him down. If they don&#039;t do it then it is their mistake. You cannot say that the Constitution is bad. The constitution gave us some rights and responsibilities and we didn&#039;t care about either one of those. Buddha gave some basic principles and some people don&#039;t follow those and still call themselves Buddhists. 

I looked up online about this guy and there definitely are people who excuse him saying, who is perfect. How lame is that? If my math teacher is a spend thrift I wouldn&#039;t be worried about that because that wouldn&#039;t prevent him from being a smart teacher. But if he  can&#039;t tell what 2+2 is, then I am definitely NOT going to be his student because that is the minimum I expect from him. And also if comes drunk to the class he is going to do a mistake some day or the other and I wouldn&#039;t be his student.

Above all I guess some common sense helps!

Srini.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent,</p>
<p>And this fellow called Chogyam Trungpa broke the basic Five Precepts and people still believed in him. So whose fault is it? Is it the believers&#8217; or Trungpa&#8217;s.<br />
If a President of USA keeps controlling the Press but still says he is abiding by the Constitution, then the citizens need to bring him down. If they don&#8217;t do it then it is their mistake. You cannot say that the Constitution is bad. The constitution gave us some rights and responsibilities and we didn&#8217;t care about either one of those. Buddha gave some basic principles and some people don&#8217;t follow those and still call themselves Buddhists. </p>
<p>I looked up online about this guy and there definitely are people who excuse him saying, who is perfect. How lame is that? If my math teacher is a spend thrift I wouldn&#8217;t be worried about that because that wouldn&#8217;t prevent him from being a smart teacher. But if he  can&#8217;t tell what 2+2 is, then I am definitely NOT going to be his student because that is the minimum I expect from him. And also if comes drunk to the class he is going to do a mistake some day or the other and I wouldn&#8217;t be his student.</p>
<p>Above all I guess some common sense helps!</p>
<p>Srini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srini</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/comment-page-3/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>5.	Nirvana: I don’t know where Vixen got his definition of Nirvana from but sounds more like the Hindu concept than the Buddhist. And also Rachel, unlike what you wrote, Nirvana is definitely a goal. If Buddha didn’t have why did he leave palace, go about from teacher to teacher, what was he trying to do? The goal is perfect happiness.

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/notself2.html

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/nirvanaverb.html

Srini.

End</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.	Nirvana: I don’t know where Vixen got his definition of Nirvana from but sounds more like the Hindu concept than the Buddhist. And also Rachel, unlike what you wrote, Nirvana is definitely a goal. If Buddha didn’t have why did he leave palace, go about from teacher to teacher, what was he trying to do? The goal is perfect happiness.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/notself2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/notself2.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/nirvanaverb.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/nirvanaverb.html</a></p>
<p>Srini.</p>
<p>End</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srini</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/comment-page-3/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/criticism-of-buddhism/#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>4.	Suffering and Karma: Buddhist teachings don’t neglect anyone’s suffering. Buddhism never said that it if a husband beats his wife, it is the wife’s fate because she did some bad Karma. Instead it said that the man is not being a good husband. It said lay people should work hard to earn money and take care of parents and family. Anyway, a person living in the richest of the countries, under the best government with the best medical care still cannot overcome suffering until he deals with his brain. 

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/lifeisnt.html
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/karma.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4.	Suffering and Karma: Buddhist teachings don’t neglect anyone’s suffering. Buddhism never said that it if a husband beats his wife, it is the wife’s fate because she did some bad Karma. Instead it said that the man is not being a good husband. It said lay people should work hard to earn money and take care of parents and family. Anyway, a person living in the richest of the countries, under the best government with the best medical care still cannot overcome suffering until he deals with his brain. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/lifeisnt.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/lifeisnt.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/karma.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/karma.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
