<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peaking with Maslow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rabe.org/conley-peak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rabe.org/conley-peak/</link>
	<description>Sharing ideas and provocations on living single while happy. Reflecting on the social psychology of stereotypes and other cultural phenomena.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.rabe.org/conley-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabe.org/conley-peak/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it would be interesting to get an example of money buying happiness - I would remove the “necessarily”&lt;/i&gt;

Money actually can buy happiness down at the bottom of Maslow&#039;s pyramid, but, as one moves up the levels, money&#039;s ability to buy happiness falls off exponentially.  If you&#039;re hungry and need food, money can buy that.  If you&#039;re cold and need a warm coat, money can buy that.  If you need social connection, money might help enable it to some extent, but any connection it can actually &quot;buy&quot; turns out to not really be the right kind of connection.  If you&#039;re looking for that hard to quantify &quot;self-actualization&quot;, there are plenty of people willing to take any amount of money to &quot;help&quot; you, but chances aren&#039;t good at attaining it.

At least that&#039;s the way I understand the need for the &quot;necessarily&quot; qualifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it would be interesting to get an example of money buying happiness &#8211; I would remove the “necessarily”</i></p>
<p>Money actually can buy happiness down at the bottom of Maslow&#8217;s pyramid, but, as one moves up the levels, money&#8217;s ability to buy happiness falls off exponentially.  If you&#8217;re hungry and need food, money can buy that.  If you&#8217;re cold and need a warm coat, money can buy that.  If you need social connection, money might help enable it to some extent, but any connection it can actually &#8220;buy&#8221; turns out to not really be the right kind of connection.  If you&#8217;re looking for that hard to quantify &#8220;self-actualization&#8221;, there are plenty of people willing to take any amount of money to &#8220;help&#8221; you, but chances aren&#8217;t good at attaining it.</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s the way I understand the need for the &#8220;necessarily&#8221; qualifier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

