Archive for Singles By Choice

Whatever happened to the radical in feminism?

I was already saddened when Gloria Steinem bend over backwards to try to justify getting married. In my eyes, she was forgetting all the feminist analysis that had critiqued marriage. As D. A. Clarke has pointed out “The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.” Just because feminists marry doesn’t change marriage, the patriarchal and privileged institution that still traps so many women (and men) in unhappy lives.

I was pretty disturbed when Steinem listed this in her list of wishes in celebration of her 75th birthday. It is one thing she’d like to see in the next 25 years.

I want any two adults to be able to marry-as long as they don’t hit each other.

There are so many things wrong with this sentence!

Here are a few that came to my mind – feel free to add more in the comments:

  • It ignores the reality of non-physical abuse, which can be just as devastating, sometimes more so, as physical abuse.
  • Why two adults? Yes, I know, polyarmory is a dirty word now but when did that ever stop feminists?!?
  • She is ignoring and devaluing any other relationship. How about wishing that our society equally values every relationship that we as human beings value?

I am deeply disturbed that the poster-woman of American feminism is forgetting so many of us in her quest to be normal, which apparently is a rather strong influence in the feminist movement as well, just like it has turned the queer movement into the marriage-equality movement.

Comments (2)

Ah, those holidays…

With the holidays upon us once again, I am faced with the annual question: what do I offer my coupled, family-committed friends? Should I offer them a replacement spouse/partner so that they can take the long weekend off to contemplate in solitude? So that they can join the scores of us singles who use these times to renew and refresh because we do not have the obligation to rush from one partner’s family’s house to the other? I feel so sorry for my poor coupled friends! As if the holidays aren’t stressful enough – now they have to do everything in duplicate. It is so draining to have to go to the dinner with family instead of kicking back with a pizza and watching old movies. A house filled with noisy kids and adults getting drunk can really depress that holiday spirit. My heartfelt condolences to all those who cannot just stroll through the woods enjoying the wonders of solitude.

So, around this time of year, I approach my coupled friends and tell them: “You poor soul, it must be so hard to be coupled around this time of year. You not only have to put up with your own family’s holiday frenzy but, no, that’s not enough, your partner’s family piles on the demands and stresses. I am sorry that you can’t just do what you want to and sleep all day!” How often I glean a shimmer of a tear in their eyes when they recover from the shock that I – the single person – am so lucky. They quickly swallow down the jealousy and pretend that I am really the poor slop. But I know better than that: All the attempts to make me feel lonely are just weak cover-ups of their need for solitude. They could not possibly admit that what they want more than anything else is hide from the masses and have a carefree holiday. And, yes, they won’t admit that they are jealous of my freedom!

Comments (2)

Uppity Single by Choice

In a previous post, I remarked that choosing to be single feels like a rather uppity thing to do. I promised to explain.

According to the Urban Dictionary “uppity” means (ignore the other two definitions!):

Taking liberties or assuming airs beyond one’s place in a social hierarchy. Assuming equality with someone higher up the social ladder.

As a single person, I am at the bottom of the social hierarchy. The hierarchy that starts with singles, then unmarried couples, then married couples. I am supposed to move up to the top by marrying someone. Instead, I dare to choose to be single and demand that I am equal to married folks. I want the hierarchy demolished but I am expected, socially, to respect it. And on top of that, I am not sad about my single status and don’t do anything to change it. In fact, I am happily single and would like to stay this way (both happy and single ;-) ).

Now, I also commented that this is uppity even for a feminist. Although many feminists have questioned marriage, a lot of them don’t. In fact, there are feminists who marry (amongst them Gloria Steinem). Feminism can incorporate marriage as a possibility by working toward egalitarian marriages. Something I find actually rather appalling. So, my choice to be single implies my critique of marriage as an outmoded, patriarchal institution that I don’t want to be a part of (well, not again, since I’ve been married before). Instead of attempting to create egalitarian marriages, my choice is to demand we find different ways of relating to each other, where relationshipse go beyond the dyadic. Thus, it is also demanding equality in the male-female hierarchy but also a call for questioning more than the equality of pay, for example, or equal access to everything, though this is also extremely important.

Comments

Writing on the Chalkwalk

I had trouble getting out of bed this morning. Only having a full agenda got me out of bed rather than staying there nurturing my self-pity or anxiety, whatever it is. None of the excuses for avoiding my morning walk were convincing even to the me that didn’t want to walk. So, my morning routine kicked in still mentally struggling with wondering if I am smart enough to be back in school. I only have evidence against that doubt from one class so far. Still waiting to hear on the other exams. And even with that class, the little dragon in my head keeps whispering that this was just a fluke the real me will soon be discovered – and she’s a failure. What’s really tugging at my soul – and that’s not meant in a religious sense but rather as a short way of referring to that which at least seems to be there beyond the material of our neurons firing, maybe consciousness would be a better term but that doesn’t sound as good during an existential struggle – what is really tugging at my soul is the realization that I’ve taken too many wrong turns in my life, that I am really not where I would like to be and the fear, sometimes overwhelming, that it’s too late to get back on my path now that I have somewhat of a sense what that path might be. And I am hitting all the social no-nos. Here I am a 40-something single woman going back to school – I am not supposed to do that! I am supposed to be happily married with 2.5 kids, established in my fulfilling career, owning a beautiful home. I don’t have any of that! I am happily single, changing careers, and renting. I have a child but he’s an adult now, so even that I’ve done backwards by having him way earlier than social norm. But, again, what’s tugging at my soul is the fear that it’s too late to change course. Maybe it’s true that we don’t learn as well when we’re older and what am I doing pursuing a philosophy degree – that’s irresponsible! I can’t make money with that! And then, I am choosing to be single. How dare I! That’s too uppity even for a feminist (I might explain that in an upcoming post – why do I think choosing to be single is uppity?).

All that, or some less articulated version of it, went through my head as I was putting on my exercise clothes. I headed out the door. And then I saw the writing on the sidewalk: Jesus loves you! “Well, at least someone loves me,” went through my head, almost immediately followed by a realization. In our hypercompetitive world where a person is only good enough if she achieves by the social standards set by who knows whom, self-love is a rarity. The only way we can get unconditional love is through an imaginary being (God) or through a dead and decomposed guy (Jesus). And this acceptable form of self-love – for if God and Jesus cannot really love you because they don’t exist, this is a form of self-love – has subverted a possibly healthier way of taking care of the self practiced in ancient philosophy. Michel Foucault put the shift this way (284):

In the Greco-Roman world, the care of the self was the mode in which individual freedom – or civic liberty, up to a point – was reflected as an ethics. [...] the theme of the care of the self thoroughly permeated moral reflection. [...] in our societies on the other hand, at a time that is very difficult to pinpoint, the care of the self became somewhat suspect. Starting at a certain point, being concerned with oneself was readily denounced as a form of self-love, a form of selfishness or self-interest in contradiction with the interest to be shown in others or the self-sacrifice required.

Jesus loves you instead of know thyself. Self-sacrifice instead of self-love. And we’re not talking about the narcissistic self-love here, we are talking about a healthy amount of self-love that counteracts the doubts of inadequacy I was struggling with and suspect many others who are venturing off the beaten path are struggling with (heck, even people who are on the beaten path). Rather than loving ourselves, we’re supposed to love God or Jesus or both and then sacrifice ourselves in their name. Only that way do we get back a self-love substitute, God’s or Jesus’ love. No wonder that so many people flock to religions! Existential angst is part of our world – we no longer learn to counter-act it by becoming a virtuous person grounded in a deep love for and knowledge of ourselves.

Maybe if we listen to the ancients some more, we can relearn how to find our way to happiness. Maybe if we cultivate healthy self-love again, we’ll see less of the unhealthy kind, which leads to destruction both of the economy and the environment. Maybe if we reconnect with ourselves, our dreams and start knowing ourselves again, we might have to buy less stuff to fill the existential hole. The planet could sure use that kind of a value-shift. So could we.

Comments (6)

Happy Singles Week!

This week marks National Singles Week (aka Unmarried and Single Americans Week). I am busy preparing for an exam (read this if you don’t know why I am taking exams again), so I am going to have to defer to others for the data crunching and analysis. Fortunately, there is quite a bit out there even though lots of people don’t even know about USA Week (yet!).

The Census Bureau has compiled some important stats on the unmarried population in the US. We are now 95.9 million strong! That is 43% of the adult population in the US. Also, please check out the press release by the Council on Contemporary Families. (Hat tip to Bella DePaulo for these links).

Bella DePaulo kicks off the week with a quiz that takes on the cultural lag between our perceptions of single and unmarried people and our reality. Check it out! It’s rather enlightening.

And, of course, as I mentioned before, there is a blog crawl going on this year organized by Single Women Rule. (Okay, I have to add that I was rather disappointed with the first post: It talks about the dating experience of a single woman. Who cares! Single folks are not (just) about dating, in fact, many of us are single by choice and aren’t even interested in dating. See also number 10 on Bella’s quiz.)

So, go read while I study but most importantly: Enjoy your week!

Update on 9/25:
Bella DePaulo has compiled a list of the good, the bad, and the ugly coverage of National Singles Week. Some of that coverage is in the spirit of Tom Coleman’s original intend with the week: To raise awareness. But a lot of it has morphed into an extreme focus on dating… As if that’s all we’re interested in: to become unsingle…

Update on 9/26
The final blog crawl post is not about dating – it is about being single and happy. Check it out!

Comments (5)

Get Ready for National Singles’ Week

Single Women Rule is inaugurating the first annual blog crawl to celebrate this year’s National Singles’ Week. Although I am a tiny bit disappointed that my blog isn’t a part of it, we’ll be able to learn about some very cool blogs, which are much more active than mine and focus on anything single related (unlike my blog…).

Featured guest bloggers include Dr. Bella DePaulo, notable psychologist and author of Singled Out: How Singles Are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After; author of the novel The Divorce Party, Laura Dave; dating/relationship writer and author of The Real Reasons Men Commit, Kimberly Dawn Neumann, writer Simone Grant of Sex, Lies and Dating, dating coach Ronnie Ann Ryan of NeverTooLate.biz, and Maryanne Comaroto, author of Hindsight: What You Need to Know Before You Drop Your Drawers.

Hopefully, this will be a single-affirming blog crawl and not a crawl that affirms the idea that singles are only interested in dating type of crawl… DePaulo will be in the first camp; not sure sure about Neumann or Ryan. I guess we’ll just have to wait and read!

(Hats off and hat tip to crawl participants Onely!)

Comments (3)