Archive for January, 2008

Rational Living: REBT and CBT

Rational-Emotive Behavioral Therapy (REBT) and its cousin, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) have been researched quite a bit. A REBT counselor and researcher in Britain, Jim Byrne, offers this research summary. Of particular interest are his “Summary Notes On REBT Research” in Section 6 (there are no links to the sections…). The most recent meta-analysis that Byrne cites, published in 2005, concludes:

A balanced approach, analyzing both the strengths and weakness, suggest that REBT has hundreds of research articles and that high-quality studies tend to support REBT’s basic theory and efficacy.

     Continue reading this post » » »

Comments (2)

Mindfulness & Meditation

Although research is as of yet inconclusive about whether meditation is beneficial, it has been beneficial to me. Admittedly, this is somewhat pseudo-scientific, yet the idea that calming the mind can benefit us seems valid, therefore I am including mindfulness as a healing tool. Just keep in mind that the jury is still out on whether meditation is better than simple relaxation or other similar tools. There is an interesting discussion on more recent research starting with this comment.

Mindfulness is a way of bringing the meditative attention developed during meditation practice to every day life.      Continue reading this post » » »

Comments

Focusing

Focusing is a humanistic, experiential approach, which may not pass most skeptics’ muster. I still include it here because I found it helpful (a rather experiential approach) even though I am not sure if the research on Focusing is very rigorous (a more objective approach).

Focusing is a way to connect to your bodily wisdom to allow you to better understand what’s going on in your life. Eugene Gendlin, a professor at the University of Chicago, was frustrated because therapy seemed to help some people but not others. So, he decided to figure out what caused this difference. To his amazement, he learned by listening to tons of audiotaped counseling sessions that the difference wasn’t the therapist but the patient. Patients who improved through therapy would pause sometimes to “look inward.” Gendlin called this Focusing and developed a process to teach this looking inward to everybody.

Basically, you start out by honing into your body and feeling if there’s anything that is trying to get your attention - often it’s a sense of tightness somewhere. Then you say “hello” to that tightness, acknowledging that it’s there and that you have noticed it (instead of trying to ignore it, which is what I usually do). Then you sit with that tightness (or whatever other feeling you have noticed) and see if it has anything to tell you. Just like in meditation, our minds are very busy trying to tell us stuff but if we can quiet it down long enough, we can find out what our bodies have to say. It is usually not as clear as the mind likes it. But if we stay with it, we can figure things out.

I tried learning focusing through Gendlin’s book and the book of one of his students - Ann Weiser Cornell. But it’s difficult, at least for me, since my head keeps coming in the way. So, I hooked up with a Focusing trainer. Then through a newsletter I found out about a Focusing group in the area. It is just amazing how much easier Focusing with a group is. In a group, two people support each other: first one person focuses and the other is mirroring back what the focuser says and sometimes pushing deeper by asking questions. Then the pair switches. I found it tremendously helpful to have someone say the things back that I felt. When you have a “felt sense” (this is what Gendlin calls the tightness or other sensation that I’ve found in my body), you try to name it. Once a name comes up, you check it against the felt sense to see if it fits. I felt hunched shoulders - the feeling as if I was trying to protect my chest, myself - and the word “weak” came up. When my partner said the word back to me, I realized that it didn’t fit - something I didn’t realize when I said the word. Someone else needed to say it. Then another word came up - defenselessness - which “felt right.” (You can now find a focusing partner through the Focusing Partnership program.)

The other thing I noticed, is that a focusing group is a group of acceptance. We were three people last Sunday (one person would focus, the other would mirror back and the third was the time keeper), and we listened to the person who was focusing without any judgment, totally supporting what they were experiencing. There was nothing right or wrong about what they felt. It just was (or is). [As an aside, Cornell uses an interesting re-wording technique that I've found tremendously helpful to create some space to deal with a feeling in a more healthy way. Instead of saying "I am angry" (or whatever feeling seems to permeate your body), Cornell suggests to say "Part of me is angry." In my experience, this signals to another part - the observer - in me that I can look at my anger, or whatever emotion, from a distance and don't have to get all caught up in it until I am anger...]

If you want to learn more about Focusing, check out www.focusing.org and www.focusingresources.com. I recommend Cornell’s book (The Power of Focusing) over Gendlin’s (Focusing), though Gendlin’s book is, of course, a classic. But Ann Weiser Cornell expands on what Gendlin talks about and she makes it more accessible, at least for me.

Comments

Meaning Making in Action

Based on my first real-world test of Eric Maisel’s call to make our own meaning, which I faced this morning triggered by the prospect of having to go back to work on Monday, here are steps for meaning creation with examples from my experience this morning.

Steps for Meaning Creation

  1. Know your symptoms. This is ongoing and probably needs to take place prior to a meaning crisis.
    • One of my depression symptoms is not wanting to get out of bed.
    • Healing tools: Mindfulness meditation and reading about depression.
  2. Recognize your symptoms.
    • I was lingering in bed, trying to come up with reasons of why it was okay to stay there.
    • Healing tool: Mindful awareness.
  3. Label the underlying problem: you are in a meaning crisis.
    • In my case, I was anxious about facing my meaningless job.
    • Healing tool: Mindful awareness.
  4. Step back and analyze your thoughts: what are your expectations here?
  5. Determine if your thoughts are contributing to the crisis.
  6. Challenge the thoughts that are contributing.
  7. Replace the thought with something that can give you meaning.
  8. Write down your answer and sense if it really is true.
    • Yes, I can see my job as a testing ground for this. And, yes, I can derive a sense of meaning from that.
    • Healing tool: Focusing.

That’s it! Granted, these steps seem easy yet, especially #7, are rather challenging. Hopefully, though, having a step-by-step approach is helpful.

Comments (2)

Man’s Search for Meaning

Victor Frankl’s book, Man’s Search for Meaning, is a classic little book on meaning, which was originally published in 1946. His development of logotherapy is woven throughout his tale of survival of numerous concentration camps during the later years of the German occupation of Austria. As historical research has shown, Frankl did not develop logotherapy in those concentration camps. Frankl underscores that as well when he recounts the destruction of an important manuscript that he had smuggled through the showers of Auschwitz, the real showers. It did not survive very long, though, and Frankl’s observation in the other concentration camps - he was only a few days in Auschwitz - was partly driven by his wish not to forget the contents of his manuscript. The situation in the concentration camps also made for an ideal test-ground of Frankl’s main hypothesis, which is summarized in his favorite Nietzsche quote: “He who has a Why to live for can bear almost any How.” Logotherapy tries to provide guidelines on finding reasons to live: “If there is a meaning in life at all, then there must be meaning in suffering” (p. 67). The ability to choose how we react to even the most dire circumstances, Frankl calls this “spiritual freedom,” cannot be taken away from us. It “makes life meaningful and purposeful” (p. 67).
     Continue reading this post » » »

Comments (1)

Not So Great Turning

I was excited when I started reading David Korten’s book “The Great Turning” because I agree with his assessment that we are currently at a crossroad: we either make some changes in the way we live soon or global warming will wreak havoc on civilization. Korten frames this as the choice between Empire and Earth Community. He does, in my opinion, and excellent job describing the perils, injustices, and dangers of Empire. However, the book becomes largely unrealistic, steeped in wishful thinking, when he begins talking about “evidence” that we are moving toward an Earth Community. I decided that I must be living on a different planet and that the Earth Community will not just happen, as Korten seems to suggest. Korten’s sense of hope seems to stem from two sources: An increase in people’s awareness that we need to change something and the existence of an Earth Community prior to the onset of Empire, which he equates with the beginning of patriarchy. Unlike in his chapter on the travails of Empire, he hardly cites any evidence for these sources of hope – other than his anecdotal experience. He also does not make any suggestions about how a 5,000 year jump in societal structure can be accomplished, i.e., how do we overcome 5,000 years of Empire? Feeling that my time would be better spent by reading other material, I abandoned the book, disappointed in what seemed such a promising beginning.
     Continue reading this post » » »

Comments